When a team is small, internal chat feels effortless. A single group thread covers most updates, everyone recognizes everyone else’s tone, and important messages “just get seen.” But once you pass roughly 20 people, chat dynamics change fast. Not because anyone is doing anything wrong, but because volume, variety of work, and the number of relationships increase. What worked for 8 people becomes noisy for 25—and fragile for 60.
Below are the most common internal chat challenges that show up after this growth point, along with practical ways to respond (without turning communication into a bureaucratic project).
1) Message overload becomes the default
Past 20 people, chat starts producing a steady stream of updates that feel individually small but collectively exhausting. People begin skimming. Important notes get missed. The fastest responders become de facto gatekeepers of information.
Common symptoms include notification fatigue, constant context switching, and a sense that you’re “always behind.”
What helps
- Create a few clear channel types (for example: announcements, project work, help, social) and encourage teams to use them consistently.
- Normalize “batching” updates: one structured message instead of five pings across an hour.
- Use lightweight conventions like “FYI,” “Action needed,” and “Decision” at the start of messages to reduce scanning effort.
2) Channels and group chats sprawl out of control
As new projects and sub-teams form, people create new chats to move faster. Over time, you end up with dozens of overlapping spaces: “project-x,” “project-x-urgent,” “project-x-client,” plus DMs that quietly become decision rooms.
The cost isn’t just clutter. It’s fragmentation: knowledge spreads across places no one can fully map.
What helps
- Set a simple channel lifecycle: create, describe, assign an owner, and archive when done.
- Require a one-line purpose in the channel description so people can self-select where to talk.
- Move decisions from DMs into the most relevant shared space when possible, so the team can find them later.
3) Search stops being “good enough”
Early on, people can scroll back and find what they need. Later, chat history becomes a swamp. Search results are inconsistent, attachments are hard to locate, and the same questions get asked repeatedly because previous answers are effectively lost.
This is where tool choice starts to matter. A business chat platform isn’t only about sending messages—it’s also about retrieval and continuity.
What helps
- Encourage one “source of truth” post after decisions: a short message that summarizes the outcome, links, and owner.
- Use pinned messages sparingly for items that must be rediscovered (process links, onboarding notes, key docs).
- If your organization needs longer retention, better indexing, or control over where data lives, consider whether a self-hosted chat or private messaging platform for business better supports those needs.
4) Important information gets shared in the wrong place
With more people and more roles, chat contains a wider range of content: customer details, HR topics, security questions, financial numbers, and internal plans. Teams often discover—after an incident—that they’ve been treating chat like an informal space when it actually contains sensitive business data.
This is one reason some teams explore a private team communication approach or even on-premise messaging: they want clearer boundaries and secure internal communication that matches their risk level.
What helps
- Define “what never goes in chat” (for example: passwords, personal data, regulated documents) and repeat it during onboarding.
- Introduce a secure way to share sensitive items (password manager, secure file portal) so people have an alternative.
- Reassess your data ownership needs: some organizations prefer messaging platform ownership so policies, retention, and access live under their control rather than a public app.
5) New joiners struggle to build context
After 20 people, onboarding by osmosis breaks down. New hires land in a maze of channels and inside jokes. They don’t know where to ask questions, what “good updates” look like, or which conversations matter.
This isn’t a motivation problem—it’s a discoverability problem.
What helps
- Create a single “start-here” channel with norms: where to post updates, where to ask for help, and how decisions are recorded.
- Standardize weekly updates (even a few bullet points) so newcomers can learn what the organization pays attention to.
- Assign a buddy and encourage questions in a shared help channel to reduce repetitive DMs.
6) Decision-making becomes invisible
In smaller teams, you can overhear choices as they happen. Past 20, decisions are made in side chats, quick calls, or private threads—and the wider team only sees the consequences. That leads to rework, frustration, and “Wait, when did we decide that?” moments.
What helps
- Adopt a habit of posting short decision notes: what was decided, why, and who owns the next step.
- Keep “decision” channels focused and lightly moderated so they don’t become another noisy feed.
- Use a repeatable format so searching later is easy.
7) Tool limitations start to shape behavior
Many teams begin with public messaging apps because they’re convenient. But as the team grows, limitations can become operational issues: weak admin controls, unclear retention, limited compliance options, or uncertainty about where data is stored.
When chat becomes business infrastructure, “good enough” features can quietly turn into real risk and real cost.
At this stage, leaders often evaluate alternatives to Slack and Teams or alternatives to WhatsApp, alternatives to Telegram, or alternatives to Signal, depending on what they started with. The point isn’t that one tool is universally best—it’s that growth increases the value of control, governance, and predictable long-term access to your own history.
What helps
- List your “non-negotiables” (admin control, security posture, integrations, retention, guest access) before comparing options.
- Decide whether you need an enterprise messaging platform with strong governance, or whether an internal messaging system you manage yourself fits better.
- If the big concern is control and privacy, explore what it would mean to own instant messenger infrastructure—an own messaging platform approach—so policies align with your organization rather than a vendor’s defaults.
Summary
Once your team grows past 20 people, internal chat usually shifts from “simple and social” to “busy and business-critical.” The most common pain points are overload, channel sprawl, poor findability, sensitive info in the wrong places, hard onboarding, invisible decisions, and tool constraints. A few lightweight norms can solve a lot—but as stakes rise, it’s also worth reassessing whether your current company messaging app gives you the control, privacy, and stability your team now needs.
Image via Unsplash